Several members of the press were present--The Record, The Town Journal, and Paramus Patch
The Record - February 5, 2011 - page L-3
Case is made against historic houseArchitect hired by developer says it is not soundBY STEPHANIE AKIN
The Record
STAFF WRITER
PARAMUS — The original structure of a house linked to Bergen County's historical freed slave community is in such poor condition that it would be almost impossible to preserve, an architect representing a developer testified on Thursday.
DON SMITH/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHERA developer wants to build homes on the site of the Zabriskie-Wessells-Board house in Paramus, which housed freed slaves. Speaking in support of a plan to raze the so-called Zabriskie-Wessells-Board slave house on Dunkerhook Road, architect Peter Wells said that renovations and neglect during the building's 250-year history have diminished its historical value.
"It doesn't even actually resemble the way it was originally built," Wells said.
The testimony was among the first since developer Sal Petruzzella's proposal was submitted to the borough in March, inciting opposition from preservationists and descendants of the original occupants as far-flung as Baltimore.
Petruzzella wants to split the 48,000-square-foot property to make way for residential construction similar to three large stone and stucco houses he built across the street.
The historic house, also known as the Zabriskie Tenant House, is listed in the Bergen County and National Historic Registers for its Dutch sandstone structure — now obscured by brick and blue clapboard — and its connection to a freed slave settlement in the area.
The house was built by the wealthy Zabriskie family, then later used as tenant housing for African-American farmers. It was willed to two longtime family employees by a Zabriskie descendant in 1892, according to Bergen County Historical Society records.
Its nomination to the historic register mentioned that it was one of the only remaining stone houses that have a documented place in Bergen County's African-American history.
It is also one of 22 properties listed in the borough's historical preservation ordinance, which requires a six-month review period before a structure can be demolished.
Mark Sokolich, Petruzzella's attorney, said he thinks the waiting period would have started when the application was first submitted, meaning it has already expired.
Sokolich, who is the mayor of Fort Lee, added that Petruzzella and his representatives have spent the time meeting with opponents of the proposal to consider alternatives to demolishing the house, including leaving it on the property and finding someone to restore it or moving it to another location — options they ultimately rejected as unfeasible.
"We have not turned a tin ear to the sensitivity of the issue," Sokolich said.
He asserted that the historical listing is the only glitch in an application that would otherwise sail through the board.
Planning Board members said during the hearing that they would prefer to find a way to keep the historical parts of the building intact but added that the borough is not likely to be able to raise the money to buy it.
"The position of this board is they don't want to see this historical building razed," said board member Martin Schwartz. "But the finances of the situation are difficult."
Opponents said Petruzzella had brushed off their concerns.
"He didn't think he could market two $1 million houses with the historical house in front," said Peggy Norris, a Ridgewood town historian and member of the Bergen County Historical Society.
T.B. Harris, one of five family members attending the hearing who say they can trace their lineage nine generations to the early occupants of the Zabriskie house, had T-shirts printed with the slogan, "Help save the Hook."
"They want to erase my history by taking down this house," Harris said. "In return, they replace it with their history, so they can tell their kids and descendants how wonderful they were, but I can't tell mine."
Among the additions to the house that Wells, the architect, said diluted its historical significance were a modern kitchen, an expanded second floor and a door cut into the rear of the building.
Moving the building would be difficult, because much of the original stone foundation has been removed and replaced with crumbling rocks, Wells said. Restoring it to its original, two-room condition would involve removing three-fourths of the structure and replacing much of what remained.
"It would be a replica, not a reconstruction," he said.
The next hearing on the proposal is scheduled for April 7.
E-mail:
akin@northjersey.com.